Matt Lebovic, This article you have written, ‘The ADL and KKK, born of the same murder, 100 years ago” for the Times of Israel dot com, perpetuates the 100 year old BIG LIE about the Leo Frank trial, what amounts to an anti-Gentile blood libel and hate crime hoax, that people were shouting death chants “hang the Jew” in the courtroom during the Leo Frank trial and intimidating the jury. The unabridged archive of Leo Frank’s appeals records at the Georgia Supreme Court (1913 and 1914) are now published online at the Internet Archive (see Archive Org) as of April 26, 2013 (the centennial of Phagan’s murder), as well as the three local Atlanta daily newspapers (Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Georgian and Atlanta Journal, April 28 to August 26, 1913) that meticulously covered the trial day-by-day from July 28, 1913 to August 26, 1913, are also now available online to be read. None of these sources reported people shouting “hang the Jew” at Leo Frank’s trial. Nothing in Leo Frank’s appeals mention any people shouting anti-Semitic hate speech during the trial. Neither the prosecution, the judge, jury, or defense ever mentioned such disruptions being made in the media or during appeals – the official record was published online on April 26, 2013 – the centennial of Phagan’s murder.

Please stop spreading blood libel and defamatory lies about the Leo Frank Case, no one ever shouted, “hang the Jew” inside the courtroom, or outside the courtroom into the open windows of the trial. This is a racist anti-Gentile hate speech fraud perpetuated by the ADL, Abraham Foxman, Leonard Dinnerstein and other prominent Jews. I encourage anyone with any doubts to review the 1,800 pages of Leo Frank’s appeals to the presiding judge Leonard Strickland Roan, and the Georgia Supreme Court on the Internet Archive (see Archive Org).

The other misrepresentation in your article is that Leo Frank was exonerated of raping and strangling Mary Phagan, this is completely false. The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, DID NOT exonerate Leo Frank, they only pardoned him (forgave him of his guilt), but they specifically stated they were not exonerating him of the murder. You can thank the American spy and espionage Anti-Semitism Lobby – The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) – lead by its current Zionist Czar, Abraham Foxman, for creating the most powerful Civil Rights group in the world that turns a blind eye to the Open Apartheid in the Rogue Pariah Terrorist State of Israel. The ADL was founded in the blood of little Mary Ann Phagan, how’s that for Blood Libel reality check? Thank you ADL for perpetuating on your web site the racist anti-Gentile that people were shouting, “Hang the Jew” – anti-Semitic death threats – into the open windows of the courtroom. Thank you for perpetuating this racist anti-Semitism canard for 100 years.

“The Leo Frank lynching, August 17, 1915 (photo credit: public domain)” – this photograph came from an estate of a long time collector of photographs and is extremely rare, perhaps the only one in existence, sold on ebay for a few hundred dollars. The image of the trial was recently released online by the AJC, April 1913, and was originally created in the afternoon of Monday, July 28, 1913, Newt Lee is being examined by Dorsey.

Dear reader please politely contact Matt Lebovic and ask him to stop perpetuating known blood libel, hate speech fraud and hate crime hoaxes about the Leo Frank Case. Also politely ask him to publicly apologize on his newspaper’s blog, ‘Times of Israel’, that it is indeed a racist lie about the so-called “hang the Jew” anti-Semitic death threat chanting courtroom incident and dispel this hatefilled, prejudiced, and racist Jewish mythology once and for all.

Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-adl-and-kkk-born-of-the-same-murder-100-years-ago/

May 27th, 2013

The ADL and KKK, born of the same murder, 100 years ago. How a scandalous Memorial Day strangling led Jews and anti-Semites to rethink survival strategies and form two stalwart organizations

By Matt Lebovic

BOSTON — Few Americans know that Memorial Day evolved from the vanquished southern states’ own “Confederate Memorial Day,” launched in 1866. Even fewer Americans remember what happened in Atlanta on Confederate Memorial Day in 1913, when a young woman’s murder led to the creation of the Anti-Defamation League and reinvigorated its nemesis, the Ku Klux Klan.

Thirteen-year old Mary Phagan was beaten and strangled in the basement of her former place of employment, an Atlanta pencil factory, on April 26, 1913. The factory was managed by 29-year-old Leo Frank, a Jew raised in Brooklyn and educated at Cornell University. After becoming investigators’ top suspect in two days, Frank submitted to a murder trial brimming with anti-Semitic vitriol, hearsay testimony and conflicting statements.

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email
and never miss our top stories Free Sign up!

In an American version of the Dreyfuss Affair, shouts of “hang the Jew!” echoed through the courthouse during the trial. The jury pronounced Frank guilty and he was sentenced to death on August 25, 1913. After a national outcry, Georgia governor John Slaton determined Frank had not received a fair trial, and his sentence was commuted to life in prison.

The commutation set off another outcry, with Slaton hung in effigy and the boycott of Jewish businesses in Atlanta. Particularly outraged were some of Georgia’s top political and civic leaders, one of whom coined the phrase, “Lynch law is better than no law at all.” Some of these men were more public than others about their bigotry, but all were outraged by the governor’s decision and what they viewed as the threat posed by Georgia’s 3,000 Jews.

Determined to enact their own verdict on Leo Frank, the leaders convened technicians and strongmen to craft a plan. Calling itself “The Knights of Mary Phagan,” the well-to-do mob kidnapped Frank from the state prison in Milledgeville and drove him to a farm outside Marietta. After hanging their victim from an oak tree, mob participants snapped photographs and took pieces of Frank’s effects to sell as souvenirs. Several children, brought to witness the lynching, can be seen clutching parents’ hands in the photos.

The Leo Frank lynching, August 17, 1915 (photo credit: public domain)

The Leo Frank lynching, August 17, 1915 (photo credit: public domain)

Half of the state’s Jews fled Georgia following the lynching, and the hanging photographs were turned into postcards for sale at local stores. Anti-Semitic media outlets contributed to the fray, including the Columbia State newspaper, which claimed: “The heroic Marietta lynchers are too modest to give their photographs to the newspapers.”

Georgia’s government covered up the Frank lynching for the better part of a century, refusing to prosecute the perpetrators or posthumously pardon Frank until 1986, years after new evidence had exonerated him. Only in 2000 were members of the lynch mob publicly named – by a private citizen, of course.

Among the ring-leaders were a former Georgia governor, several mayors, and a slew of judges and sheriffs. Incredibly, some of their faces appear in the lynch mob photographs, belying the decades-old claim that no perpetrators could be identified.

It was not evident at the time, but this elite gathering of Georgia’s most prominent bigots to hang a Jew marked the rebirth of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).
Early Klan cross burning. (photo credit: public domain)

Early Klan cross burning. (photo credit: public domain)

The Klan was started by Confederate war veterans after the Civil War to prevent freed slaves from obtaining rights. It has been called the first true terrorist group founded on American soil. Though the US government managed to dismantle the so-called First Klan, its mission remained alive in the minds of racist whites committed to overturning an unjust order.

The Leo Frank case inspired Klan-sympathizing racists to expand the parameters of hate by including Jews, who they viewed as dishonest and alien to white society. A cross-burning ceremony attended by some of Frank’s murderers in 1917 marked the official launch of the Second Klan. Future US Senator Tom Watson helped reignite Klan activities through incitement in southern newspapers.

However racists and anti-Semites weren’t the only ones to draw conclusions from the Leo Frank trial and refocus on organizational structures.

Immediately after Frank’s wrongful conviction in 1913, the B’nai B’rith Jewish service organization founded the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Frank had been the Atlanta chapter president of B’nai B’rith before his trial, so the ADL’s creation within this network was more than appropriate.
The original B’nai B’rith announcement of the formation of the ADL. (photo credit: public domain)

The original B’nai B’rith announcement of the formation of the ADL. (photo credit: public domain)

“The immediate object of the League is to stop, by appeals to reason and conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people,” said the League’s 1913 charter. “Its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens.”

Founded in Chicago, the ADL currently operates 27 regional US offices and one in Israel. Its mandate to prevent defamation of Jews has greatly expanded since 1913, highlighted by decades of work to pass the Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA) in 2009. In recent years, the ADL ramped up efforts to protect Israel from numerous worldwide detractors.

Following Leo Frank’s lynching, the Ku Klux Klan also learned the value of coalitions and clarity of purpose, adopting modern business practices to grow membership.
Klan recruiters – called “Kleagles” – were allowed to keep half of initiation fees, while standardized costumes and rituals consolidated the system.
‘The Birth of a Nation’ film in 1915 helped launch the Klan and ‘invented’ Klan iconography (photo credit: public domain)

‘The Birth of a Nation’ film in 1915 helped launch the Klan and ‘invented’ Klan iconography (photo credit: public domain)

D.W. Griffith’s February 1915 film, “The Birth of a Nation,” rolled out First Klan iconography still familiar around the world, including burning crosses and those bulky white robes. Two decades before “Triumph of the Will” and Hitler’s fire-strewn rallies, the Klan nailed down the indoctrination genre much closer to home.

Preaching “One Hundred Percent Americanism,” at its peak the Klan claimed to include more than four-million men as supporters. Klan leader William J. Simmons developed new terminology for his brethren, including Kloran (ritual book), Klavern (local organization), and Klectoken (initiation fee).

This Second Klan ceased activity during World War II, only to reappear in the 1950s as the current Third Klan. More lethal than ever, the civil rights-era KKK murdered African American leaders and their white allies, in addition to bombing blacks’ homes and churches. The Klan continued to receive support from prominent leaders, including when Birmingham police commissioner Bull Connor allowed Klan members fifteen minutes to attack “Freedom Riders” in 1961.

Despite downsizing and the alleged victory of pluralism, the Ku Klux Klan is by no means a relic of the past.

Experts estimate there to be 5,000 active Klan members today, most of them in the American South and Midwest

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) continues to monitor at least 100 Klan chapters, including in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana. Recent years have seen the formation of Klan chapters in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and Germany, proving the power of bigotry to break down national barriers. Experts estimate there to be 5,000 active Klan members today, most of them in the American South and Midwest.

Though modern Klan chapters remain decentralized to prevent infiltration, it’s clear the election of President Barack Obama in 2008 fueled membership across the board. Klan leaders have also formed recent alliances with Neo-Nazi groups to fight against illegal immigration and same-sex civil marriage. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has provided – to some observers’ frustration – ongoing support for Klan members’ rights to hold rallies and run for public office.
This is the cover of the 1999 cast of the Broadway production of Jason Robert Brown’s ‘Parade.’ (photo credit: Michael Sultana, CC BY SA, via wikipedia)

This is the cover of the 1999 cast of the Broadway production of Jason Robert Brown’s ‘Parade.’ (photo credit: Michael Sultana, CC BY SA, via wikipedia)

The epic struggle between the ADL and the KKK’s conflicting worldviews has entered pop culture, including the 1999 musical “Parade,” based on the Leo Frank trial and its aftermath. A Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) special in 2009 signaled a broad approach through its title, “The People v. Leo Frank: Anti-Semitism in the USA.” And shedding light on Atlanta society circa 1913 and the justice system’s deadly breakdown was the 2003 book, “And the Dead Shall Rise,” by Steve Oney.

Leo Frank’s body was buried on August 20, 1915, in the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Queens, New York. Before his mutilated remains were transferred north, a crowd of 15,000 Atlanta citizens – some carrying bricks – surrounded the undertaker’s parlor and demanded to see the body. The most prominent lynching of an American Jew had occurred, giving simultaneous impetus to both Jewish self-defense and the country’s most notorious group of hatemongers.

Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-adl-and-kkk-born-of-the-same-murder-100-years-ago/

Also See: ADL and Leonard Dinnerstein

Please politely contact Yaakov Astor and ask him to stop his racist anti-Gentile smear and defamation campaign promoting Jewish hate crime hoaxes and hate speech hoaxes concerning Gentiles and the Leo Frank Trial. The anti-Semitism canard has been used by Jewish extremists for the last century as a blood libel against Gentiles.

Yaakov Astor’s Blog
https://yaakovastor.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/zman-tishrei/

—–

The Tragic Saga of Leo Frank

It launched the Ku Klux Klan and the Anti-Defamation League. It inflamed a community and ignited a nation. It brought out the worst in people and the best in people….

It is the tragic story of Leo Frank – and it happened in America.

Standing trial for murdering a Christian girl as crowds outside the courtroom screamed for his blood — intimidating witnesses, jury members, judges and politicians — the evidence against Leo Frank was so full of holes that the judge later declared that he was innocent. The lawyer of his main accuser eventually acknowledged that the accuser himself was the murderer.

Yet, none of that was able to stem the tsunami of anti-Semitism. Even as convincing new evidence demonstrating his innocence came to surface, a mob – later discovered to include high-ranking politicians and prominent Georgian community members – abducted Frank right out of prison and lynched him.

Terrifying and infuriating, the story of Leo Frank touches on so many raw nerves that even today, almost a century later, people are afraid to bring up the subject for fear of inflaming old passions and stirring old hatreds.

August 6, 1913. The atmosphere in the streets is fraught with tension. Frenzied hordes march around government buildings, wielding rifles and other weapons. They surround the courthouse where the trial of a Jew falsely accused of murdering a young Christian girl is taking place.

“Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!” the crowds shout raucously, brandishing their weapons.

“Kill the Jews who killed our savior!” resonates in the street.

The atmosphere is reminiscent of the medieval pogroms of Europe. Rabble-rousing sermons by local priests and other anti-Semitic leaders have aroused the passions of the ignorant masses. And the minority of rational, level-headed individuals are simply too intimidated to take a stand against the blatant injustice and rabid anti-Semitism. It is just too risky.

It reads like an old-world legend from the Middle Ages, but incredibly this happened in the twentieth century in the United States – land of the free and home of the brave.

The city was Atlanta, capital of Georgia. The frenzied hordes wielding rifles and other weapons were red-blooded American citizens. The government building they surrounded was the Fulton County Superior Court House of Atlanta.

The governor of Georgia, a respected and popular man, is trying desperately to keep the situation under control. He has called in the National Guard and the military to protect Jewish neighborhoods. Privately, he has prayed that justice prevail and that he will not have to use force. However, he does not, at that point, fathom how deep the hatred runs and how inflamed the passions have become. Neither does he know the steep price he will pay for trying to help the hapless Jew.

Then, just like now, the Jews of Atlanta felt safe and secure as American citizens with equal rights to pursue the American dream of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They lived under the illusion that their non-Jewish neighbors regarded them as equals, and that anti-Semitism was relatively non-existent in America. Then their illusion was shattered. Abruptly, they were faced with the shocking realization that even after doing their utmost to assimilate into the American melting pot, they were no less immune from virulent anti-Semitism than their openly Jewish relatives in the “alte heim.”

This past August 17 marked the 96th anniversary of that dark chapter in American history, when an innocent Jew named Leo Frank was lynched by a group of Americans, not exclusively by low-class, uneducated street ruffians, but by the elite of Atlanta society, including elected officials and judges. Zman headed south on a fact-finding mission to the Jewish community in Atlanta to speak with community leaders, relatives and others well-read in the Leo Frank saga who have invested much effort clearing Frank’s name decades after his brutal murder.

Read the entire story in this month’s issue…

Please politely contact Yaakov Astor and ask him to stop his racist anti-Gentile smear and defamation campaign promoting Jewish hate crime hoaxes and hate speech hoaxes concerning Gentiles and the Leo Frank Trial. The anti-Semitism canard has been used by Jewish extremists for the last century as a blood libel against Gentiles.

Yaakov Astor’s Blog
https://yaakovastor.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/zman-tishrei/

References:

August 6, 1913. The atmosphere in the streets is fraught with tension. Frenzied hordes march around government buildings, wielding rifles and other weapons. They surround the courthouse where the trial of a Jew falsely accused of murdering a young Christian girl is taking place. “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!” the crowds shout raucously, brandishing their weapons. “Kill the Jews who killed our savior!” resonates in the street.

http://www.zmanmagazine.com/PDF/Leo%20Frank.pdf

Please contact the History Channel and politely ask them to stop promoting the Jewish Community’s Hate Crime Hoax, Anti-Gentile Blood Libel and Anti-Semitism Canard against European-Americans concerning the Leo Frank Case. Politely contact them at http://www.history.com/support

Jewish Pathological Lies at the History Channel:
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/girl-murdered-in-pencil-factory

Thirteen-year-old Mary Phagan is found sexually molested and murdered in the basement of the Atlanta, Georgia, pencil factory where she worked. Her murder later led to one of the most disgraceful episodes of bigotry, injustice, and mob violence in American history.

Next to Phagan’s body were two small notes that purported to pin the crime on Newt Lee, the night watchman at the factory. Lee was arrested, but it quickly became evident that the notes were a crude attempt by the barely literate Jim Conley to cover up his own involvement. Conley was the factory’s janitor, a black man, and a well-known drunk.

Conley then decided to shift the blame toward Leo Frank, the Jewish owner of the factory. Despite the absurdity of Conley’s claims, they nevertheless took hold. The case’s prosecutor was Hugh Dorsey, a notorious bigot and friend of Georgia’s populist leader, Tom Watson. Reportedly, Watson told Dorsey, “Hell, we can lynch a nigger anytime in Georgia, but when do we get the chance to hang a Yankee Jew?”

Frank was tried by Judge Leonard Roan, who allowed the blatantly unfair trial to go forward even after he was privately informed by Conley’s attorney that Conley had admitted to Frank’s innocence on more than one occasion. The trial was packed with Watson’s followers and readers of his racist newspaper, Jeffersonian. The jury was terrorized into a conviction despite the complete lack of evidence against Frank.

Georgia governor John Slaton initiated his own investigation and quickly concluded that Frank was completely innocent. Three weeks before his term ended, Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence in the hope that he would eventually be freed when the publicity died down. However, Watson had other plans: He mobilized his supporters to form the Knights of Mary Phagan. Thousands of Jewish residents in Atlanta were forced to flee the city because police refused to stop the lynch mob.

The Knights of Mary Phagan then made their way to the prison farm where Frank was incarcerated. They handcuffed the warden and the guards and abducted Frank, bringing him to Marietta, Phagan’s hometown. There he was hanged to death from a giant oak tree. Thousands of spectators came to watch and have their picture taken in front of his lifeless body. The police did nothing to stop the spectacle.

Although most of the country was outraged and horrified by the lynching, Watson remained very popular in Georgia. In fact, he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1920.

Frank did not receive a posthumous pardon until 1986, on the grounds that his lynching deprived him of his right to appeal his conviction.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/girl-murdered-in-pencil-factory

Please contact the History Channel and politely ask them to stop the racist anti-Gentile Leo Frank hate crime hoax at http://www.history.com/support

By Tingba Muhammad, NOI Research Group | Last updated: May 6, 2013 – 12:56:20 PM

What’s your opinion on this article?

Printer Friendly Page

“Throughout the history of Black people, B’nai B’rith leaders are conspicuously found aiding Black enslavement—not Black freedom—and the 512-page Nation of Islam book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Vol. 2, makes this abundantly clear.” —LaRon X

(FinalCall.com) – This year the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) celebrates 100 years of open hatred and bigotry against the freedom aims of Black people. It is an organization whose foundation and history are as racist and malevolent as any secret society, and it has proved itself to be dedicated to maintaining white supremacy for all time. Last week, its grand ruler Abe Foxman—whose life work bears an uncanny resemblance to Dr. King’s notorious nemesis, Birmingham’s Eugene “Bull” Connor—continued his attack on Black freedom by derisively referring to the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan’s monumental year-long series The Time and What Must Be Done as “52-weeks of hate.”

Today, by Allah’s grace, we have clear guidance that allows us to decipher the tricks of an open enemy through the window of history and the sunlight of truth. To better see the ADL going forward, let us first look backward—more than 52 weeks—to a birth record that goes back 170 years.

In October of 1843, twelve Jewish merchants gathered in New York to establish the ADL’s parent organization B’nai B’rith. The Hebrew words mean “Sons of the Covenant,” a title that refers to the bond God established with the Children of Israel in Genesis 15:13-14:  And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; 
And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance.

The claim of these white Europeans to be the biblical Chosen People has been definitively disproved (See Shlomo Sand’s book, The Invention of the Jewish People); nevertheless, these B’nai B’rith founders chose to adopt that mantle on behalf of American Jews. They posed as “strangers” in their adopted land, but Jews were so well entrenched on the profit side of the slave system that they joined Pharaoh’s team and embraced African slavery without reservation. B’nai B’rith organizers put the “covenant” aside and established branches among the many Jewish planters and merchants throughout the South. By the time that civil war broke out in 1861, Africans had faced affliction and slavery for 306 years. But when these ”Sons of the Covenant” met the “Sons of the Confederates” they became one. So many Jewish merchants were collaborating with the Southern Confederates that a Lincoln administration official deemed the B’nai B’rith to be a “disloyal organization” that “help[ed] the traitors.”

“The ADL claims that it’s very first and most-celebrated effort was in the Leo Frank Case in Atlanta, Georgia. Frank was a factory manager and president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith. In 1913, he was convicted of murdering a 13-year-old Gentile girl in his factory on the Jewish Sabbath after he tried to rape her. With the evidence mounting against him, Leo Frank—true to B’nai B’rith form—blamed one Black man for the murder, then another.” —LaRon X

Throughout the history of Black people, B’nai B’rith leaders are conspicuously found aiding Black enslavement—not Black freedom—and the 512-page Nation of Islam book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Vol. 2, makes this abundantly clear. “Sons of the Covenant” were slave owners, plantation owners, and bankers financing the purchases of slaves. For another 100 years after slavery Jewish planters, moneylenders, and merchants—dubbed by scholar W. E. B. Du Bois as the “heirs of the slave-barons”—continued to enslave Black people, this time through sharecropping and debt peonage.

Southern senator Zebulon Vance dedicated his life to ensuring that after slavery Blacks would never rise in any capacity above servant and menial laborer. In Raleigh, North Carolina, the B’nai B’rith has held an annual wreath-laying ceremony at his statue, with Nathan Straus, the Jewish head of Macy’s department store, financing it. Arkansas governor Jeff Davis—whose most “trusted lieutenant” was B’nai B’rith president Charles Jacobson—publicly defended the lynching of Blacks. He and Jacobson supported the Arkansas Streetcar Segregation Act of 1903, which established the same discrimination Rosa Parks would fight in Alabama more than a half century later. A B’nai B’rith member helped create and install Birmingham’s inferior “colored” school system, while all of that city’s wealthy Jewish business owners practiced the harshest forms of segregation. The B’nai B’rith was the staunchest supporter of President Woodrow Wilson, even though he systematically eliminated Blacks from government jobs, just as Adolf Hitler would do to the Jews in Germany.

Meanwhile, the national president of B’nai B’rith, Simon Wolf (1836–1923), was speaking publicly and proudly of the true Covenant of Jewish power: “We all know that the first bankers of the world—Rothschilds—are Jews; we know they control not only the money market, but also the political destiny of the European world…” Mr. Wolf could have added that the Rothschilds’ immense fortune was built totally on that family’s marketing of the many products of the slave trade—cotton, sugar, coffee, and tobacco, among them.

Blacks today might be shocked to pull off the hood of a Ku Klux Klansman and find a yarmulke (a Jewish skull cap) underneath. But B’nai B’rith public relations director Bernard Postal wrote that “Jews Played a Part in All of [the] Klan-Like Organizations…” He revealed that “The manufacturers of the ubiquitous Klan night-gown have frequently been Jews.”

Chinese Americans would probably be interested to know that B’nai B’rith official Isidor N. Choynski attacked the Chinese for taking jobs from Caucasian workers: “If ever there was a blot on American civilization it is this Chinese curse,” he wrote in the major Jewish newspaper American Israelite. The Japanese fared a little better: “[T]he Japs look decent and are far preferable to the heathen Chinese; yet [they are] as close and calculating as their moon-eyed cousins.”

And so with its demonstrated record of demolishing Black freedoms, the B’nai B’rith went ahead and established a new division in 1913, calling it the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a group its founders claim would be dedicated to confronting “anti-Semitism” in America.

The ADL claims that it’s very first and most-celebrated effort was in the Leo Frank Case in Atlanta, Georgia. Frank was a factory manager and president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith. In 1913, he was convicted of murdering a 13-year-old Gentile girl in his factory on the Jewish Sabbath after he tried to rape her. With the evidence mounting against him, Leo Frank—true to B’nai B’rith form—blamed one Black man for the murder, then another. When those Blacks stood up and gave testimony that proved Frank’s guilt, he tried to dismiss them as “niggers” and “criminals.” He hired private detectives who planted evidence to frame the Black men, all the while maintaining that he as a white man was not capable of the murder because murder and rape were “negro crimes.” When a Southern white prosecutor, jury, and judge sided with the Blacks, Frank and the ADL cried “Anti-Semitism”!

How do we know that “anti-Semitism” is a phony ADL creation? Because the aforementioned president of B’nai B’rith, Simon Wolf, wrote in 1906 that if there were “anti-Semitism” in America, he “failed to find it.” He added ominously: “There is more danger of anti-semitism arising from our own ranks than from any that may come from those of other faiths.”

By the time Abe Foxman took over in 1987, the ADL had become successor to J. Edgar Hoover’s ruthlessly racist COINTELPRO operation. The ADL was soon spying on 12,000 individuals and more than 950 groups. The NAACP, the Nation of Islam, and even Pres. Nelson Mandela and his African National Congress (ANC) were among the many, many victims of ADL espionage.

And what happened to the ADL’s original mission? In 2009, Israeli documentary filmmakers followed Foxman and his staff around for a few weeks to try to chronicle this alleged “anti-Semitism.” A fascinating sequence shows a nervous ADL official at a computer vainly trying to produce a single case of “anti-Semitism” for the filmmakers, even though the ADL had claimed 1,500 incidents that year! The Israeli-produced film titled Defamation remains the most devastating exposé of the ADL’s farcical operation on record.

So this is the time-honored and white supremacist legacy of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. It teaches Blacks two things: (1) that no people with such a racist legacy could possibly be “The Sons of the Covenant”; and (2) that The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad was correct: “The enemy cannot be but a hypocrite who will now try to change to offer you friendship. The same enemy who fought and killed you yesterday cannot turn overnight and become your friend.”

Abe Foxman has stuck out his hypocritical hand of “friendship” to Blacks, his fist full of 170 years of wicked and racist deception. The ADL targets the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan because he knows their well-documented history and has revealed it to the world. The Minister has also revealed the true identity of the Children of the Covenant with these words: “The Honorable Elijah Muhammad said that Almighty God Allah revealed to him that the Black people of America are the REAL Children of Israel and we are the choice of God and that unto us, He will deliver His Promise.”

We can be Allah’s Chosen or the Jews’ Deceived. The choice is now in our hands.

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/article_9823.shtml

Visit: www.FinalCall.com

Atlanta Constitution Newspaper.
http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseInTheAtlantaConstitutionNewspaper1913To1915

Atlanta Georgian Newspaper.
http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

Atlanta Journal Newspaper.
http://archive.org/details/AtlantaJournalApril281913toAugust311913

The prosecutor Hugh Dorsey’s closing arguments (who later became Governor years later).

Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank. Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies of this books. This is an excellent book and required reading to see how Dorsey in sales vernacular ‘closed’ a Jury of 12 men and Judge Roan. Digital Source: www.Archive.org

Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Records and Brief of Evidence (1913, 1914).
http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

Senator Tom Watson of Georgia wrote about the case in his Watson’s Magazine in 1915.

August, 1915. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source www.Archive.org

September, 1915. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source www.Archive.org

October, 1915. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: www.Archive.org

The first book ever written about the Leo Frank Case in 1913.
The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913

John De Nugent’s Excellent Expose on the Leo Frank Case.
http://www.democratic-republicans.us/english/english-remembering-and-avenging-beautiful-mary-ann-phagan-raped-and-killed-by-a-leading-new-york-jew-exactly-100-years-ago-this-month-in-atlanta-georgia

The American Mercury Articles About Leo Frank.

One Hundred Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/

Who Really Solved the Mary Phagan Murder Case?
http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/10/who-really-solved-the-mary-phagan-murder-case/

The Leo Frank Case (by Leonard Dinnerstein): A Pseudo-History.
http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/10/the-leo-frank-case-a-pseudo-history/

Did Leo Frank Confess?
http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/09/did-leo-frank-confess/

Four superb articles about the Leo Frank Case published on ‘The American Mercury’

1. One Hundred Reasons Why Leo Frank is Guilty:
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/

2. Did Leo Frank Confess?: http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/09/did-leo-frank-confess/

3. A Review of Steve Oney’s 2003 Book on the Leo Frank Case: Who Really Solved the Mary Phagan Murder Mystery? http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/10/who-really-solved-the-mary-phagan-murder-case/

4. A Review of Leonard Dinnerstein’s Book on the Leo Frank Case: The Leo Frank Case Pseudo-History! http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/10/the-leo-frank-case-a-pseudo-history/

Visit: The American Mercury

A special program on the 100th anniversary of the rape/murder of 13-year-old Mary Phagan (pictured right) on April 26, 1913 in Atlanta, Ga.

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager put the emphasis on the Jewish agenda to “overturn the verdict” against Leo Frank in the minds of Americans and people everywhere, and explain how Jewry goes about it. From regular appeals for Leo Frank in the Jewish New York Times; to circulating false stories that the jurors were influenced by mobs outside the courthouse shouting “Hang the Jew”, and were even personally threatened; to bringing up “new testimony” 69 years later from the only surviving witness at the trial (Alonzo Mann); to gaining a meaningless Pardon that does not exonerate Frank, but is only a sort of apology for not protecting him in prison; to creating a musical and television docu-drama about Frank’s innocence — Jewry goes all out in their effort to change the perception toward this pedophile-murderer to that of innocent victim of antisemitism. And they pretty much succeed! But here is a song for Mary by Fiddlin’ John Carson, compliments of Hadding.

The ADL (Anti-Defamation League) also formed in that year to declare Frank’s innocence and continues its work to cover up or minimize all crimes by Jews by labeling any accusations “antisemitism.”

One Hour Radio Program:

http://thewhitenetwork.com/2013/04/25/jewish-reaction-to-the-guilt-of-leo-frank/

26 April 2013
Leo Frank, Jewish Murderer
In April 1913 Leo Max Frank, the superintendant of a pencil factory in Atlanta, Georgia, murdered a 13-year-old White female employee who spurned his sexual advances. In August 1913, after what was then the longest trial in Georgia history, Frank was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.

When the outgoing Governor of Georgia, John Slaton, then commuted Frank’s sentence amid accusations that he had been bought, a group of respected citizens that included a former governor, the son of a senator, a Methodist minister, a state legislator, and a former state Superior Court judge, went to the prison where Frank was held, took him away, pronounced sentence, and hanged him. By this lynching, it was felt, the rich man who had murdered a poor girl was prevented from using his wealth and influence to escape justice.

Organized Jewry has always tried to obfuscate Frank’s guilt. There are two arguments that are used to this end.

First, there is the claim that Leo Frank was prosecuted and convicted because of anti-Semitism. This claim was rejected by credible prominent Georgians at the time.

Governor John Slaton was asked by the New York Times, in the period after the commutation but before the lynching, about whether hostility toward Jews had been a factor in the prosecution of Frank. Contrary to what is commonly asserted today, his response was in the negative:

No Race Prejudice.

“Do you think the question of race prejudice had anything to do with the case against Frank?

“No. You will find prejudice against foreigners on the part of some people in Georgia just as you will find the same thing in New England, here in New York, or anywhere else. Georgia is as human as any state in the Union.”

“Is there any prejudice against Jews in Georgia as a result of the Frank case?”

“I answer that question by pointing to the fact that one of the Trustees of the Colony of Georgia under Oglethorpe was Minas, a Jew, whose descendants to this day are among the best and most highly respected of Georgians. The head of the Education Board in Atlanta is a Jew, and so is the Vice President of the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce. My own law-partner, Mr. Phillips, is a Jew. Some of the best of Georgians are Jews.” [New York Times, 30 June 1915]

Although Slaton dodges the question about whether anti-Jewish feeling had developed in Georgia as a result of the Frank case, he indicates that there had not been much hostility toward Jews in Georgia prior to the Frank case, and that the prosecution was therefore unlikely to have been motivated by hostility toward Jews.

In fact some antipathy toward Jews had developed in Georgia as a result of events relating to the Frank case, but the hostility toward Slaton himself, for his actions on behalf of organized Jewry, seems to have been greater. At a public demonstration in Marietta, Slaton was called “King of the Jews” for commuting Frank’s sentence.

On 20 August 1915, three days after Frank was lynched, the New York Times carried comments from Slaton’s successor as Governor of Georgia, Nathaniel Harris, who said that the feeling toward Jews in Georgia had been thoroughly positive — until it became apparent, in the case of Leo Frank, that organized Jewry was attempting to save a Jewish criminal from righteous punishment simply because he was a Jew. The correspondent said to Governor Harris that Georgia had “shocked the Union” and he responded:

“I know it,” said the Governor. “This awful horror hurts the State. But I don’t think the North has had the right idea about the feeling against this dead man. It was not for the reasons that have been given for it. It was not because he was a Jew; there never was any anti-Jewish feeling in Georgia until now. It was because, in the first place, there is something that unbalances men. Here in the South where women are concerned. I won’t call it chivalry, or call it anything’ it is, if you like, something that destroys a man’s ability and even willingness to do cold and exact justice. I have been a lawyer for over forty years, and have had many cases in the courts, and I have found that where a woman is the plaintiff she will get twice the damages a man would who had the same case.

“That is the way it is in the South; it cannot be argued against, and must be accepted as a fact. If a woman is the victim of a crime, a fury seizes upon our men.

[…]

“Now, that was the first thing. But there was another thing that roused bitterness against Frank, and it was outside interference. From all over the Union there came an attempt to govern Georgia’s action. Detectives were sent here, petitions circulated, resolutions passed, attacks made upon the State. Whether it should have aroused resentment may be a question, but that it did there is no question whatever.

“These are two things that in the first place created anger against Frank.”

“Not among the ignorant classes, surely,” said the correspondent. “They don’t read papers from other States.”

“But they learned what those papers were saying,” answered the Governor. “What was said outside of the State was commented on by the papers here, and Tom Watson in his weekly published parts of the original criticisms; whether correctly quoted or not, I do not know. All classes in Georgia knew what was being said and done, and knew of the organized efforts to set Frank free, and every one of these efforts deepened the feeling against him.”

“You said a while ago that there had never been any anti-Jewish feeling in the State until now,” said the correspondent. “Is there now?”

“I am afraid there is,” said the Governor reluctantly. “But I hope it is only a flurry and will pass away. It is among the more thoughtless of our people. There has never been an atom, never a trace or a thought of it. The Jews have always been our friends; we have here the best class of Jews. For a man to be known as a Jew was actually an asset to him in a business way. But among the thoughtless elements there has grown up – temporarily, I hope – a feeling that the Jews banded themselves together as a race or a religion to save a criminal, and out of that has grown a feeling of hostility. [New York Times, 20 August 1915]

The second argument is based on the affidavit given 69 years after the crime by Alonzo Mann. Tom Watson Brown, a prominent Georgia attorney who graduated from Harvard Law School, has shredded the claim that Mann’s affidavit proves anything of significance:

The affidavit produced in March of 1982 by 83-year old Alonzo M. Mann truly beggars belief.

Mann was an office boy working in Leo Frank’s second-floor office at the time of the murder and was called as a defense witness during Frank’s murder trial. Mann testified at that trial that he worked with Frank in the latter’s office during the morning of the April 26, 1913 murder and left the office at 11:30 a.m. He also testified as to his belief in Frank’s good character. [...]

Of course, Mann’s affidavit does not rise to the dignity of the trial testimony of Jim Conley which it is apparently intended to challenge. Conley testified under oath, pursuant to examination by the prosecution attorneys and was vigorously cross-examined for some three days by the very capable lead attorneys for Frank’s defense team. Trial observers and counsel for both prosecution and defense agreed that Conley’ s testimony had not been broken by the cross-examination. It was a critical element, among many, in corroborating the circumstantial evidence and other evidence leading to Frank’s conviction.

Among the questions which are raised by Mann’s affidavit [of 1982] are:

Why has he come forward only at this late date? He was interviewed in 1913 by the Atlanta police investigating the crime and by defense counsel for Frank. If he had any information to shed on the crime such as he now purports to set forth in his affidavit, would it not have been extracted by skilled interrogators from a fourteen-year old boy? Would he not have volunteered it at that time?

Mann’s assertion that he was afraid of Conley and Conley’s purported threat to kill him if he revealed what he saw that day hardly merits belief. Conley was arrested on the Tuesday after the crime (despite Frank’ s efforts to shield him) and remained in jail from that day throughout the trial and for a year after his own conviction for being an accomplice-after-the-fact in Mary Phagan’s murder, leaving Mann in complete safety. In addition, Conley died in 1962, a fact which must have been known to Mann; hence, why his silence for the following twenty years?

Likewise, Mann’s assertion that his mother’s admonition to say nothing about what he had seen seems most unlikely to be followed by any fourteen-year old youth with the slightest semblance of conscience. Concealing evidence in a murder trial is, of course, a crime in itself. Mann purported to have a regard for Frank and after Frank’s conviction, if not before, surely he would have come forward with whatever favorable evidence he had.

In addition, Atlanta was covered by agents and operatives on behalf of Frank’s defense before, during and for many months after the trial seeking out any scrap of information pertaining to the crime and Frank’s conviction. Large sums of money were expended in this process, rewards were offered, and promises made.

Again, it cannot be believed that Mann would not have come forward during these well publicized searches.

Mann asserts that he saw Conley on the first floor of the building between the elevator shaft and the trap door to the basement, carrying a female body. Mann places himself between Conley and the front door which afforded him a ready way of escape. Mann knew that Frank was (or should have been) upstairs in the second floor office at the time; he also knew workmen were in the building on the upper floors — all affording ready means of assistance to him and to the victim. In addition, the streets outside the factory were teeming with the thousands of people who had assembled to watch the Confederate Memorial Day Parade which Mary Phagan had herself intended to observe. Mann had only to retrace his few steps to the front door and sound the alarm to produce numbers of rescuers who would have been more than eager to mete out punishment to Conley for what was at that time the most heinous offense in Georgia moral structure, the rape and murder of a White girl by a Black male. Could any fourteen-year old boy in the Atlanta of 1913 be so craven or frightened as to not, even if he did not seek to help the victim personally, cry out for assistance from any of these sources? To pose the question is to answer it.

In short, Mann’s affidavit lacks credibility.

Perhaps of greater significance is that Mann’s recitation of the scene that he saw, i.e., Jim Conley carrying the body of a girl towards the trap door leading to the basement, is not inconsistent with the prosecution’s case on which Frank’s conviction was based, i.e., that Frank waited for Mary Phagan to appear in his office for her pay, lured her into the metal room, assaulted her there, struck and killed her when she resisted his advances and, subsequently, called for Conley to come to the second floor, collect the body and remove it to the basement for incineration or later removal. If the scene that Mann now asserts took place, it varies from the prosecution’s case so insignificantly as to be not worthy of any motion to this Board for a new review of Frank’s case, much less a “posthumous pardon.” In particular, it does not explain away all those other factors which pointed to Frank’s guilt. [Tom Watson Brown, Notes on the Case of Leo Max Frank and its Aftermath(1982)]

If there was no particular hostility toward Jews in Georgia prior to the prosecution of Leo Frank for murder, and if Alonzo Mann’s affidavit changes nothing, then there is no sound basis for continuing to claim, as organized Jewry has been wont to do, that Leo Frank was an innocent victim of anti-Semitism.

Listen to Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott discuss the case.

Travel down the timeweb to the fall of 1913 in Atlanta, Georgia, you are now a Georgia Supreme Court Justice!

How would you rule on Leo Frank’s petitions and appeals, in essence upon his conviction, based upon the official record presented to you? Would you leave undisturbed the verdict rendered against Leo Frank for the Murder of Mary Phagan?

The 1,800 page elusive Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case Records, 1913, 1914, that contains within it the Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913), has been published for the first time here on ‘The Internet Archive’ @ www.Archive.org – officially released on Friday, April 26, 2013, the centennial of Mary Anne Phagan’s Murder, that occurred so long ago on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913, at the National Pencil Company on 37-41 South Forsyth Street in Downtown Atlanta, Georgia.

Leo Frank was lynched or hanged (depending on who you ask) nearly 28 months later at dawn on August 17, 1915, in a sylvan grove belonging to Sheriff William J. Frey. What you will find in this mega archive is information never before seen or published in any book on the Leo Frank Case in the last 100 years. The elusive records are now open to the public on the centennial of the Mary Phagan murder!

Look for information about alleged bite marks on Mary Phagan’s neck and shoulder, do they exist? Were Oney, Dinnerstein, Alphin, Golden, correct about these bite marks existing? Are they reported in the three daily newspapers, the trial testimony, the appeals records, the autopsy reports? Other than Pierre van Paassen, is there really any proof these bite marks existed?

Also available on ‘The Internet Archive’ is the elusive Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (BOE, 1913), separate from the Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case Records (1913, 1914), this too has never before been published online, until it was published here for the first on ‘The Internet Archive’ www.Archive.org — what is the verdict after you read the BOE? The Georgia Supreme Court ruled the testimony and evidence presented at the Leo Frank trial was sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty. Were they correct or anti-Semitic murderers? Read the 1,800 page Georgia Supreme Court records. Is there anything about biting in there? Did the Georgia Supreme Court make the correct decision when it left the verdict of guilt undisturbed? Read it.

The Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Records (1913, 1914):
http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL), Patron Father and Martyr of Anti-Semitism: Leo Frank, Atlanta B’nai B’rith President

Serial pedophile-rapist and convicted child killer, Leo Max Frank, violently assaulted, raped, and garroted 13-year-old little Mary Anne Phagan (born Thursday, June 1, 1899) at minutes past twelve-noon, on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913. Phagan was viciously murdered, inside the National Pencil Company’s metal department (colloquially known as the “metal room”), which was located at the rear section of the factory’s second floor. A glimpse of what happened to Phagan during that fateful noon hour, was revealed months later at the Leo Frank trial, when one of the physicians, who performed an autopsy on her, mounted the witness stand and forensically described in medical detail, what his analysis of the cadaver indicated: (Mary Phagan Autopsy Report, 1913).

Born in the Pedophile-Rape & Strangulation of Mary Phagan: Happy 100th Birthday Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL)

In the days, weeks, and months leading up to and surrounding Sunday, October 20th, 2013, the well organized international Jewish community, will commemorate with much fanfare and maudlin pomp, the monumental centennial founding of ‘ADL’, the infamous organization established in 1913 as ‘Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith’. This well known, impressively funded, and politically powerful Jewish-Israel lobby and activist group that masquerades as a civil rights group, was created by ‘B’nai B’rith’ in direct response to the August 25, 1913, conviction of 29-year-old Jewish industrialist, Leo M. Frank, who was sentenced to hang, for strangling one of his child laborers, 13-year-old Mary Phagan, in downtown Atlanta, Georgia.

Leo Frank the B’nai B’rith President of Atlanta (1912 to 1914):

The commonly held belief, by majority of the Jewish community since 1913, has always been that 29-year-old Leo Max Frank was railroaded for the grisly murder of Mary Ann Phagan, because of Gentile anti-Semitic prejudice, media frenzies/sensationalism and jury intimidation by the Mob (in its classical meaning), not because of compelling forensic evidence in the second floor metal room, testimony of defense and prosecution witnesses, or circumstantial facts. Moreover, Leo Frank had been elected B’nai B’rith President of the Atlanta Gatecity Lodge in the Autumn of 1912 and less than one month after his sensational trial concluded in the summer of 1913, in open defiance of his guilty verdict and death sentence, he was unanimously re-elected (AC, September 24, 1913) by his local 500-member strong Jewish Fraternal Lodge. The men who made up the membership of B’nai B’rith ( Hebrew: בני ברית, “Sons of the Covenant”), were more often than not, the social, political and financial elite of Jewry. Frank would continue to proudly manage the affairs of his B’nai B’rith chapter while incarcerated, and as his appeals began wending their way through the judicial system, there was great hope for his vindication amongst his growing allies and supporters. By 1915, the Leo Frank case, that had consolidated as an inflammatory national cause celebre for the American Jewish community, was becoming an international incident on the periphery, with rumors about Jewish groups throughout major European cities like Paris and even far-off Moscow, organizing and agitating locally on his behalf, to bring awareness to his plight and predicament, while crystallizing Jewish tribal cohesiveness through the pathology of persecution and victomology.

The “Cold Case” (?) Case that Refuses to Gather Dust:

The Frank-Phagan affair started out as an unmitigated local scandal for the Jewish community in 1913 Atlanta, Georgia, destined to fade into the social and legal annals of intriguing and tragic criminal history, as do all heinous crimes against children, but instead the criminal case went viral in 1914 and 1915, when Jewish media magnate Adolf Ochs, embraced the drama playing out in the judicial appeals system, as his own personal crusade, and began using his flagship press organ, the New York Times, to regularly publicize the appeals of Leo M. Frank vs… With all the forces of the organized Jewish community working behind the scenes, the Leo Frank Case became the most infamous cause celebre of early 20th century U.S. history, and perhaps all of U.S. history, centered around the Jewish-American community seeking his vindication and liberation for their Atlanta President for the Sons of the Covenant. The ensuing inferno and Jewish media circus, galvanized the ADL of B’nai B’rith, to rally behind Leo Frank as an iconic martyr of Gentile inspired judicial persecution and American anti-Semitism ever since 1913. This 1913 conflict gave birth to the Jewish-Gentile American culture wars, that have now consumed all of Western Civilization since day 0, and have successfully put the United States of America into irreversible terminal decline as of 2013.

July 1913 the most powerful lawfirm in Georgia History Forms:

In 1915 the Governor of Georgia, John Marshall Slaton, used his executive privilege, commuting Leo Frank’s death sentence to life in prison. The conflict of interest caused riots to form around several regional cities around Georgia, in part because Governor Slaton was senior law partner and part owner of the merged lawfirm, ‘Rosser, Brandon, Slaton and Phillips’. This law group that formed officially via merger in July of 1913, and represented Leo Frank at his trial, and also during some of Frank’s most high profile state appeals to the Georgia Supreme Court. The lawfirm lead by Luther Zeigler Rosser and Morris Brandon (Jewish-American attorney), merging with John M. Slaton and Benjamin Z. Phillips (Jewish-American attorney) was considered the most powerful law group in Atlanta at the time, because its political and financial connections reached to the highest echelons of Georgian government with ‘Slaton’ added to its name.

21st Century Jewish Racial Activism and un-American Jewish Domestic Extremism:

The popular mainstream culture that has been most prominently cultivated over the last century, has been one united around the position that leading up to the trial of Leo Frank, he was scapegoated during the Mary Phagan murder inquest and wrongfully indicted by the Grand Jury, because of incendiary sectarian divisions and societal tensions at the time, that all came to a focal point, involving: Union-North verses Confederate-South political animosity; class struggle between an ambivalent bourgeoisie, and blue-collar proletariat; transformational growing-pains between the declining agrarian economy in the surrounding regions and surging industrial revolutions on the ground; underlying racial hostilities of White vs. Black, yellow journalism in the Atlanta media; and traditional Christian prejudices against Jews from antiquity. But none of these Jewish Hollywood theories ever directly address the fact the Georgia Supreme Court vetted the Leo Frank trial transcript through its Brief of Evidence, ruled the testimony and exhibits sustained the verdict of guilt rendered against Leo Frank. Moreover, every level of the United States legal system from State to Federal tribunals ro pardons boards, from 1913 to 1986, have rendered decisions that left the verdict of the Leo Frank trial jury undisturbed – including the pardon. So, why have less qualified Jewish intellectuals, leaders, professors, historians, academics, journalists, and authors, cultivated the mythology over the last hundred years that Leo Frank was innocent? Why has this century-old Jewish mythology been transformed into a multi-million dollar Hollywood-Broadway popular-culture and mainstream Jewish carnival sideshow? What would possess Jews to transform a perverted Jewish serial pedophile-rapist and convicted child killer into a deity revered symbol of Anti-Semitic Martyrdom.

The Jewish Genetic Algorithm: Is DNA an Equation?

The answer is revealed from studying 5,773 years of Jewish history, through the lens of 21st century evolutionary psychology, evolutionary strategy, and behavioral genetics. The ethnoreligious parasite-host symbiosis of Jewish genetic evolutionary strategy and Gentile culture, is based on a sado-masochistically dysfunctional relationship where Jews agitate against and antagonize the nation states of Western Civilization as fundamentally hostile to Jewish racial interests, and this can be lucidly seen throughout the 20th century, but before we can look deeper into Jewish tribal activism and racist Jewish extremism, first, let’s travel back in time to 1913, the beginning of how the species of this 20th century Jewish culture war against European-Americans was born that rages on today in 2013:

The ADL’s Viciously Racist Anti-Gentile Blood Libel Accusations (2013):

The Anti-Defamation League has been perpetuating one of the longest ongoing racist hatecrime hoaxes in American history since 1913, claiming that an “innocent” Northern Jew, Leo M. Frank, was convicted and sentenced to death in the South — the last holdout and vestige of European-American ethnic solidarity — not because of the circumstantial facts and incriminating evidence presented at his 29-day trial, but absurd and unfounded anti-Semitic conspiracy theories created by racist Jewish activists and extremists known as Frankites. Most of the rumors, hoaxes and conflations perpetuated by Jewish activists do not stand up to even minimal scrutiny, but by using the big lie method, invented by Jews, all the of misrepresentations of the Leo Frank Case have become the mainstream orthodoxy in 2013 after 100 years of cultivation.

The ADL also claims that anti-Semitism wasn’t only just “hanging heavily inside the courtroom”, but that their were mobs of angry Gentiles were chanting anti-Jewish bloody murder outside the Atlanta courthouse loud enough to be heard inside the courtroom of the Leo Frank trial. Thus given that air-conditioners hadn’t been invented yet, it is widely known the windows were opened during boiling hot summertime trials, because of the geographical location of Atlanta, thus implying anti-Jewish chanting infiltrated the proceedings and influenced the outcome of the jury. Some Jews hide behind cowardly language when making these false assertions and insinuations, yet others like Leonard Dinnerstein, Robert Seitz Frey and other prominent people who perpetuate outright bald-faced lies about the case.

According to Abraham Foxman’s official ADL website and their ADL FaceBook page:

“Hang the Jew, Hang the Jew”. This was the cry of the furious mob outside the Atlanta courthouse where Leo Frank, a Northern Jew, stood trial after his arrest in 1913 for a murder he did not commit. Anti-Semitism hung heavy in the courtroom as Frank was found guilty and sentenced to death.”

(Source: ADL History 1913 to 1920 www.ADL.org/ADLHistory/1913_1920.asp)

We Demand an Apology and a Retraction by the ADL and Leonard Dinnerstein, about people shouting anti-Semitic death chants into the Leo Frank trial courtroom.

These racist anti-Gentile smears have been perpetuated as genuine history by the ADL for nearly a century and species of this hoax have evolved and been repeated numerous times by the majority of Jewish-American authors and journalists who have written about the Leo Frank case (Oney, Alphin, Melnick, Frey, Dinnerstein and others). However, these claims amount to nothing more than racist defamation, because none of the three major Atlanta newspapers that meticulously covered every detail of the Leo Frank trial ever reported such incidents. Teams of reporters from every major newspaper in Atlanta were not only inside the courtroom, but also outside the courthouse. Moreover, none of Leo Frank’s appeals to the Georgian Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court, ever mention any anti-Semitic statements shouted by mobs of people outside the courtroom.

Is the ADL Falsifying Evidence and Creating a Hatecrime Hoax?

The ADL claims to fight anti-Semitism, bigotry and hate, except when the bigotry and hate is directed at European-Americans or Arabs by Jews, then the ADL is completely silent, except for its rare token gestures to blunt criticism of its duel policies, Communist Multicultural Leftwing for America and Apartheid Racial Separatist Right Wing for Israel. Many people, Jews and Gentiles alike, despise the ADL, because they consider it to be deep down a grotesquely racist, zionist, bigoted and prejudiced organization, pretending to be a civil rights group, known to manufacture or exaggerate anti-Semitism, anti-Semitic hate crime hoaxes and use blood libel against Gentiles.

The March 11, 1986, ADL Sponsored Posthumous Pardon of Leo Max Frank

The Alonzo Mann Affair (1913 to 1986) that was born in 1982, and it turned into another mainstream media Hoax that was meant to vindicate Leo Frank, but the publicity stunt failed to get him exonerated at first, to the outrage of the organized Jewish community in 1983. However the ADL was able to use the 1982/1983 Alonzo Mann media circus as a spring board to secure a highly political posthumous pardon for Leo Frank in 1986, but without exonerating him of the crime. Most of the time when the Leo Frank posthumous pardon is mentioned, the fact he was not exonerated of the crime is almost always left out, to give people the false impression his guilt was overturned and that he was framed. Then comes the Jewish racist blame game against the African-American community, claiming Jim Conley – the accessory after the fact – did it by himself without Leo Frank.

The ADL One Hundred Years Later

The 21st century reveals the ADL has evolved into more than just an other Hydra-Head of the American Jewish Lobby, masquerading as a civil rights organization, but what it really is: An un-American Israeli lobby, that smears patriots as extremists, racists, White supremacists or anti-Semites, if they as individuals or as part of groups, dare criticize the untold history of Jewish War Crimes Against Humanity waged by the Jews from antiquity, all the way today via the Israeli government and North American Jews waging extermination upon Arabs living in the occupied State of Palestine and surrounding regions.

Public Dossiers From a Non Profit: Spying on Gentiles

The ADL even publishes dossiers on their web site as a fear-smear tactic to intimidate, discredit and silence people that criticize Jewish racism, Jewish hate and Jewish chauvinism. One hundred years after its birth, the Anti-Defamation League, Southern Poverty Law Center and AIPAC, have become the vanguard of the all pervasive and politically powerful racist Jewish Nationalist (Zionist) movement, that conspicuously promotes one set of values for Western nations like America and another for Israel. The proof of this is the culture of fear that no politician can ever get elected to US Congress or stay there, who openly takes the side of Palestinians as victims of the core middle east conflict of ethnic cleansing conducted by Israel, which is ultimately enabled, via U.S. military equipment, and financed with American tax payer dollars.

In Leo Frank’s Left Fist We Trust

Born in the blood of 13-year old Mary Phagan’s rape and strangulation, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, the Jewish HIV virus infecting Western Civilization and causing the disease of Jewish cultural AIDS to put the American Superpower into irreversible terminal decline as of 2013. Thank you! Congratulations on 100 years of your success in promoting Left for the West and Right for Israel!

Definitive Proof the Anti-Defamation League is falsifying history and perpetuating a racist and anti-Gentile hatecrime hoax against European-Americans about the Leo Frank trial, which directly led to the ADL founding:

Leo Frank first appeal, motion for a new trial, August 27, through Oct 31, 1913. http://www.leofrank.org/library/georgia-archives/motion-for-new-trial/. Note there is nothing about anti-Semitic death threats and chants made at the Leo Frank trial, whether inside or outside the courtroom.

The Atlanta Constitution (focused between 1913 and 1915, with other issues before and after this date range) & Atlanta Georgian newspaper (April 28 through August, 1913). http://www.leofrank.org/library/atlanta-georgian/ (Atlanta Georgian) and the Atlanta Constitution http://www.leofrank.org/library/atlanta-constitution-issues/ and the Atlanta Journal which is now in our Newspaper section. Nothing in the “yellow journalism” Atlanta Georgian or mainstream Atlanta Constitution newspapers ever mentions anything about anti-Semitic death threats occurring during the Leo Frank trial whether inside or outside the courtroom. Also see the better organized Newspaper section of the Leo Frank Research Library Archive for the newly added Atlanta Journal and Tom Watson’s delicious witty sarcasm.

References and Required Reading:

Parental Discretion is Advised: The Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case Records (http://www.leofrank.org/images/georgia-supreme-court-case-files/ in 2 volumes) reveal an ugly conspiracy of criminal activity to liberate Leo Frank, involving the Governor John M. Slaton, who was senior law partner and part owner of the lawfirm, ‘Rosser, Brandon, Slaton and Phillips’ (Merged July 1913) that represented Leo Frank during his Trial in 1913 and his state appeals in 1913, 1914.

Learn About the Subversive ADL that says nothing about the bigotry and racism of Apartheid Israel:

The Dark Side of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL): http://www.leofrank.org/adl/

Leo Frank and the American Jewish Community for the American Jewish Archive Journal 1968 volume 20 number 2, by Leonard Dinnerstein author of ‘The Leo Frank Case’ editions 1968 through 2008.

Leonard Dinnerstein’s Hatecrime Hoax on Page 110:

Beyond the main testimony, the jurors had little more on which to base their decision than hearsay, rumors, and unsubstantiated accusations. Yet most members of the public were thoroughly convinced of the defendant’s guilt and made their voices heard, The intense summer heat necessitated that the courtroom windows be left open, and remarks from the crowds could be heard easily by those inside. “Crack the Jew’s neck!” – “Lynch him!” – were some of the epithets emerging from the more boisterous. Threats were also made “against the jury that they would be lynched if they did not hang that ‘damned sheeny.’ ”

Leonard Dinnerstein (b. May 5, 1934) completed his Columbia University Ph.D., Dissertation on the Leo Max Frank Case (1966) for the Political Science Department. The central thesis of his dissertation is Anti-Semitism was responsible for an innocent Jewish man, Leo Frank, getting convicted for the murder of Mary Phagan in 1913. Dinnerstein’s dissertation became the species for his book, “The Leo Frank Case”, which would go through a number of editions in its evolution beginning in 1968 with the first edition.

Leonard Dinnerstein’s Works and Associated References:

Leo Frank and the American Jewish Community (1968) by Leonard Dinnerstein: http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankAndTheAmericanJewishCommunity

The Leo Frank Case (1966) PhD Dissertation: http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankCase1966Dissertation (Fact checking time)

To Number Our Days by Pierre van Paassen (see pages 237, 238 about the Leo Frank case): http://archive.org/details/ToNumberOurDaysByPierreVanPaassen

The Leo Frank Case Georgia Supreme Court Case Records (1,800 pages). http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

For studying the Leo Frank Case, the Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Georgian and Atlanta Journal are available in PDF format, and should be studied from April, 1913, through till August, 1915, in-order to get the best grasp of the Frank-Phagan case (1913 to 1915) in the the three major local competing daily Atlanta newspapers, that together defined the heart of the Georgian mainstream media.

After reading these three local Atlanta Georgia newspapers from 1913 to 1915 on ‘The Internet Archive’, it is time for you to decide the truth, first as the Judge and Jury, and secondly, then as the Georgia Supreme Court Justices, to determine whether or not, the verdict rendered against Leo Frank on August 25, 1913, by the jury, and on August 26, 1913, by the judge, was indeed correct and should stand:

First Step:

1. You are now the Judge and Jury, read the official Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence from beginning to end, sifting it and pass your verdict. Would you leave the verdict of the jury and judge undisturbed?

Second Step:

2. You are now the Georgia Supreme Court, read the Leo Frank Supreme Court Records in either individual images or PDF, from beginning to end, sifting it and pass your verdict. Would you leave the verdict of the jury and judge undisturbed?

Open Discussion Forum:

To discuss the Leo Frank Case, join Brooklyn College Professor Allen Koenigsberg’s, Leo Frank Case Yahoo Discussion Group, from the Leo Frank Case: Open or Closed, website: http://www.LeoFrankCase.com (The Leo Frank Research Library is NOT affiliated with Professor Allen Koenigsberg or his Leo Frank Case website/yahoo group.)

Last Updated: April 26, 2013.

The following elusive items were added to the Leo Frank Case and Trial Research Library and Archive:

April 26, 1913, the three Competing Atlanta Newspapers are published online in PDF from April to August, 1913:

1. The Atlanta Constitution Newspaper from 1913 to 1915. http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseInTheAtlantaConstitutionNewspaper1913To1915

2. The Atlanta Georgian newspaper covering the Leo Frank Case from April though August, 1913. http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

3. The Atlanta Journal Newspaper, April, 28, 1913, through till the end of August, 1913, pertaining to the Leo Frank Case: http://archive.org/details/AtlantaJournalApril281913toAugust311913

In these three newspapers be sure to read the testimony during the Coroner’s Inquest and pay special attention to the Leo Frank Trial Transcript, and 4 days of Closing Arguments from July 28, 1913 to August 25th, 1913.

The Alonzo Mann Hoax Involving the Jewish Community Petition for Exoneration & Posthumous Pardon

News articles from the Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann Hoax, were added to: http://www.leofrank.org/images/alonzo-mann-newspaper/. Learn about how Alonzo Mann sold his soul to the Jewish supremacist hate mongers who used it to further their culture and genetic war against Americans and Western Civilization.

http://www.leofrank.org/alonzo-mann/.

Elusive Legal Records Suppressed for One Century:

Brief of Evidence July 28, 1913 to August 25, 1913:

The online ‘Internet Archive’ version of Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence 1913

1914 to 1917, Jeffersonian Newspaper Archive in Image Format Specifically About Leo M. Frank and Related Topics (80% complete)

The Jeffersonian Newspaper, 1914 through 1917 about the Leo Frank Case: http://leofrank.org/images/jeffersonian/

Dr. Edward R. Fields’ Analysis February, 1961:

Dr. Edward R. Fields wrote his take on the case in The Thunderbolt magazine in February 1961. He takes the side against Frank as you will clearly see by reading it. The booklet is clearly biased for the prosecution and is provided here for historical archive reasons. In terms of fact accuracy and logical reasoning it gets 3+ stars out of 5 stars.

Download: Dr. Fields’ Analysis in Adobe PDF format.

Dr. Edward Fields visited Mary Phagan’s grave on April 26, 2013, to commemorate the centennial of her murder. He placed flowers at her grave.

Instauration, June, 1986:

http://www.instaurationonline.com/ The romanticizing and idealizing of the Jewish pedophile Leo Frank, written by one of the most prolific writers of the traditionalist American views. See the June 1986 issue.
Download: http://www.leofrank.org/library/instauration-1986-06-june-part-1.pdf

Tom E. Watson Archive (try searching on individual and various keyword combinations: leo frank, “leo frank”, luther rosser, john slaton, mary phagan etc…)

The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers (recommended) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson/

Testimony of Jim Conley: http://www.leofrank.org/jim-conley-august-4-5-6/

Some interesting new materials added to the ‘Leo M. Frank Case Research Library’

‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ by Mary Phagan Kean.

Arguably the most even handed book on the Leo M. Frank Case, the book titled, ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ was written on behalf of Mary Anne Phagan (1899 to 1913), by her namesake and great-grand-niece, Mary Phagan Kean and published in 1987. The book makes the best attempt of all the books on the subject to provide a fair and balanced overview of what really happened, against the tide of numerous contemporary writers who mostly take the side of Leo Frank and claim he was railroaded, framed and scapegoated in a vast Anti-Jewish conspiracy.

If you are looking for a neutral account of the Leo M. Frank trial and aftermath, without taking sides, you will definitely want to read ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ by Mary Phagan Kean. The book is available for download in Adobe PDF Format here: The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (click right mouse button and save as), 204 pages and 4.7MB. We obtained the digital copy of this book from archive.org and provide it as an addition in our library here for your perusal.

To read or write reviews of this book, you may also visit ‘The Internet Archive’: ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ By Mary Phagan Kean review and download page on www.archive.org.

Five booklets, published as articles on the Leo M. Frank Case by Tom Watson.

Tom Watson, populist libertarian politician, writer, activist and seasoned lawyer.

Firebrand Tom Watson, a citizen of the State of Georgia, produced through his ‘Jeffersonian Publishing Company’ a monthly magazine called, ‘Watson’s Magazine’ and a newspaper titled, ‘The Jeffersonian’. Watson often criticized what he perceived as a corrupt and Internationalist Catholic Church, and during the tail end of the Leo Frank court appeals process, he unleashed ferociously sarcastic, devilishly witty and venomously energetic article booklets articulating Leo Frank’s guilt and condemning the Jewish Community and Frank partisans, generally known as Frankites, for waging a successful national media smear campaign against the State of Georgia and precipitating a letter writing campaigns across the northern and western states that resulted in an avalanche of support on behalf of Leo Frank drowning Governor John Marshal Slaton office with over 100,000 letters.

The Primary Southern Perception about the National “Jewish” War Waged Against the State of Georgia in 1914, and 1915.

Watson stepped into the media, social and political boxing ring, taking very distinct and personal interest in Leo Frank’s case after what was widely perceived and condemned amongst Southerners and particularly Georgians, as a national (and perhaps international because of rallies held in European Cities) media defamation war lead by the Jewish community waged against the State of Georgia.

Watson Articulates the Prosecution Position

Tom Watson’s writings on the Leo M. Frank Case tended to exquisitely articulate the prosecution side of the case (arguably better than the state’s prosecution team), including zooming in and expanding on the most damaging evidence presented at the trial. The reaction by Southerners after reading Watson’s five collective works (Watson’s Magazine, Jan, March, August, Sept and October 1915) tended to inflame an already great inferno of rage and indignation felt by the good people of Georgia and the South.

The perception Southerners had, before Watson published his five major works on the Leo Frank case, was they were being hounded by an outsider and National Jewish controlled press. Watson claimed Southerners for the first time experienced the new found power of the united Jewsmedia, which was smearing Georgians as small-minded and hidebound xenophobic cave dwellers, savages that would stop at nothing to quench their blood thirst. Once the commutation order was published by the office of Governor John M. Slaton after June 21st 1915, the people accused their Governor of being a toady manipulated by Jewish and moneybag meddlers, who undermined the Justice System of Georgia.

According to the Jewish Community, Watson Inspired the Lynching of Leo Frank

With strong reason, the Jewish community and many of Frank’s partisans would respond by accusing Watson of stirring up an Anti-Semitic climate of race hatred and inspiring the extra-judicial lynching of Leo Frank. Moreover, after the lynching, Watson continued to publish superb and commanding articulations of the Leo M. Frank trial, which were so well received by the citizens of Georgia, that observers might argue, made it impossible to convict any members of the lynch party, that is if their names had ever be made public at the time. However, it could also be equally argued that even if Watson, had not made comprehensible and definitive articulations of Frank’s guilt in his post lynching publications, that the mood of the people would still have made it impossible to convict Frank’s vigilante assassins. Though it is safe to say that the majority of the public had already made up their minds about Frank’s guilt by the time 1915 rolled around, Watson can be said to have mainly provided articulation of the great masses of Georgia that had full belief in Leo Frank’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Watson poured literary gasoline on that fiery precipitous of rage the people of Georgia experienced witnessing for the first time in any individual U.S. state, the vicious fist of Jewish Media Control seizing power over popular opinion in the United States of America (See: Watson’s Magazine, October, 1915). Since 1913, Jewish media control has slowly transformed the U.S. from a free Western superpower nation into an androgynous Jewish multicultural empire and police state nightmare in terminal decline towards civil war and eventual break-up.

Watson’s Magazine September and October, 1915

Watson offers his best legal analysis on the Leo M. Frank Case in his September and October 1915 issues of Watson’s Magazine. The arguments made against Leo M. Frank published in the September 1915 issue of Watson’s Magazine are possibly or arguably better than the actual arguments given by Prosecutor Hugh M. Dorsey and Mr. Hooper during the final August days of the Leo M. Frank Trial. Those who take the side of the prosecution might also claim there has yet to be a better articulation of Leo Frank’s guilt, than Watson’s August, Sept and Oct of 1915 publications. For the Jewish Community, Watson’s August, September and October 1915 publications would stand as the apogee of Anti-Semitism concerning the Leo Frank Case.

Prosecution Team vs. Tom Watson

For those familiar with the facts and evidence in the Leo M. Frank Case, one should read and review the Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey and Argument of Mr. Hooper comparing them with Watson’s September 1915 “Jew Pervert” booklet / article. Which particular ones tend to provide superior arguments using the murder trial testimony captured in the Brief of Evidence (1913).

Slaton on the Charge of Anti-Semitism

Though taking the side of Leo Frank, Governor John M. Slaton, would tend to corroborate Watson and the concerns of Southerners, by writing in his commutation order, that the charges of race hatred and injustice against the State of Georgia were unfair and that the people making such false accusations never actually read the official record or understood the facts in the Leo M. Frank case.

Ironically

Watson was approached at one unnamed point early in the Mary Phagan murder investigation to join the prosecution team and ironically enough, it is said that Watson was before that, originally approached by an unnamed party who offered him $5,000 to defend Leo M. Frank and join the Frank Legal Defense Team. Watson refused both offers, but his writing in 1914 and 1915, clearly indicates his position on the case. For those who are aficionados of exploring the time-web, it would have been truly fascinating beyond words to have read Watson’s arguments on behalf of Leo Frank had he accepted the five grand and joined the defense team. Watson’s closing arguments would have been equally delicious, if not more so if he had joined the State’s prosecution team.

Read these Five Watson’s Magazine in Order, 1915:

1 Star. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: January 1915 in Adobe PDF format. Watson introduces the Frank case in this edition. In terms of it’s logical arguments and reasoning it gets 2 to 2.5 out of 5 stars.

2 Stars. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: March 1915 in Adobe PDF format. Here Watson goes into much further detail on the Frank case. In terms of it’s logical arguments and reasoning it gets 2.5 to 3 out of 5 stars.

3 Stars. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volume 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: August 1915 in Adobe PDF format. Watson calls the Frank trial the “celebrated case.” In terms of it’s logical arguments and reasoning it gets 4 to 4.5 out of 5 stars.

4 Stars. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: September 1915 in Adobe PDF format. Showing his true colors, Watson dubs Frank a “Jew pervert.” In terms of it’s logical arguments and reasoning it gets 5 out of 5 stars.

5 Stars. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: October 1915. Watson criticizes the “rich Jews” that indict the State of Georgia. In terms of it’s logical arguments and reasoning it gets 4 to 4.5 out of 5 stars.

Read and compare Watson’s August, Sept and Oct 1915 publications on Leo M. Frank.

American State Trials by John D. Lawson

A 1918 Primary Source emerged about the Leo M. Frank case produced by John D. Lawson, it provides an extensively abridged version of the Official Record in the 1913 Leo M. Frank trial. It is worth reading and comparing it directly with the testimony provided within the unabridged 1913 Official Record / Brief of Evidence. You can see what Lawson left out in terms of evidence and testimony, which is very interesting. Be sure to read the closing arguments of Luther Rosser, Reuben Arnold, Mr. Frank Hooper and Hugh M. Dorsey. These closing arguments are rarely given the lengthy and indepth analysis they deserve.

Compare American State Trials Volume X with the Official Brief of Evidence in the 1913 Leo M. Frank trial, both are available here.

A journal of major U.S. court cases, this one included much about Leo Frank. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: American State Trials 1918, Volume X.

The [Leo] Frank Case: The First Neutral Book Published About the Leo M. Frank Case in 1913

A book published shortly after the conviction of Leo M. Frank that goes into some very interesting depths on some subjects. Highly recommended, albeit the fact that this rare original book used for the scan shows the decades of exposure to air and use. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: The Frank Case.

Agrarian Rebel: The Biography of Tom Watson

Tom Watson, writer, lawyer and former U.S. Senator and House of Representatives member from the State of Georgia. Read the 1938 Biography, ‘Tom Watson: Agrarian Rebel’. Available for download in Adobe PDF format: Agrarian Rebel the Biography of Tom Watson from www.Archive.org.

The Internet Archive version of Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence 1913

Instauration, June, 1986, is an addition to the Leo Frank library and archive. Instauration represents the right winger view on the Leo Frank pardon, which is an opinion shared by many people.

The Jeffersonian Newspaper on Leo M. Frank, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917 (80% complete): http://www.leofrank.org/images/jeffersonian/

Library of Congress “Chronicling America” Leo Frank newspaper Search

Be sure to read the Brief of Evidence, before reviewing these other works for the best understanding of the differing opinions on the Leo M. Frank Case.

Trial Testimony of Jim Conley: http://www.leofrank.org/jim-conley-august-4-5-6/

Required Reading, Leo Frank Documents (in PDF): http://www.leofrank.org/library/

Read the 1,800 Page Georgia Supreme Court Archive on the Leo Frank Case:

Leo Frank Appeals Georgia Supreme Court Complete Record (1,800+ pages). http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

Last Updated: April 26, 2013, Word Count 2476